Dazzle Dvc 170 Rev 1.2 Driver -
Forums filled with desperate posts: “Dazzle DVC 170 Rev 1.2 driver not working on Windows 7!” People thought their hardware was bricked. They didn't realize the solution lay not with Dazzle, but with the chip inside. A clever user discovered that the generic Empia EM28xx reference driver (specifically version 1.2.3.0 or later) worked perfectly with the Rev 1.2 hardware. Even more interesting, the driver from the Pinnacle Studio MovieBox USB (another EM2860 device) was a drop-in replacement.
But the DVC 170 had a secret. Inside, it wasn't truly a "Dazzle." It was built around the chipset—a widely used, reliable video bridge chip. This meant that the "Rev 1.2" (Revision 1.2 of the hardware) was nearly identical to dozens of other capture devices from brands like Hauppauge, Pinnacle, and Startech. The only real difference was the sticker on the plastic case. The Driver Crisis For years, the DVC 170 worked beautifully with the drivers on the included CD-ROM—for Windows XP. But when Windows Vista and then Windows 7 arrived, users faced a crisis. The original Dazzle drivers were unsigned, buggy, or simply refused to install. Dazzle’s parent company had moved on to newer products, leaving the Rev 1.2 for dead. dazzle dvc 170 rev 1.2 driver
The DVC 170 Rev 1.2 wasn’t glamorous. It was a USB video capture device about the size of a deck of cards. On one side, it had composite (RCA) and S-Video inputs. On the other, a USB cable that plugged into your Windows XP machine. Its job was simple: take the analog video from an old camcorder or VCR and convert it into a digital stream that your computer could understand. Forums filled with desperate posts: “Dazzle DVC 170 Rev 1
In the mid-2000s, if you wanted to turn your family’s VHS tapes into digital files, you had two choices: buy an expensive professional card, or visit your local electronics store and pick up a small, silver-and-red box called the Dazzle DVC 170 . Even more interesting, the driver from the Pinnacle



There's got to be some kind of twist that's going to happen with this. I don't know if they're setting up an April Fool's joke now or what's going on, but it seems too strange that they'd suddenly reverse on doing a fourth and fifth season after the show was already renewed and they were even just talking about working on those seasons like a couple months ago or something. Or maybe the two episodes yet to release will secretly somehow each be like a "season" in themselves?