Gaussian 09 Citation Endnote 🎁 Must Read
“Do not truncate the authors of Gaussian 09. The et al. is a lie.”
Word crashed.
She reopened EndNote. She edited the field. She saved. She updated the Word document. She held her breath.
“You’re still on the citation?” he said. “Back in my day, we typed ‘Gaussian 09, Revision D.01’ by hand and the reviewers just trusted us.” gaussian 09 citation endnote
Her advisor, a gruff physical chemist named Professor Hammond, had one unbreakable rule: “If you used Gaussian 09, you cite it properly. Not the manual. The primary literature. And it goes into EndNote perfectly, or I will print your .log files and eat them.”
Just then, Professor Hammond walked by, holding a printed .log file. He glanced at her screen.
“You used the ‘Angewandte’ style. It compresses authors. You must edit the output style.” “Do not truncate the authors of Gaussian 09
“Still et al.!” she yelled. “The ghost lied to me!”
Her hand cramped. There were over twenty names. She whispered a curse into the stale air of her cubicle.
Hammond leaned closer. “Delete the period after ‘al’ in the citation. The journal wants a comma. And for God’s sake, make sure you cited the Revision . If you used D.01 but cite A.02, your work is fraudulent.” She reopened EndNote
It was correct. It was hideous. It was 12-point Times New Roman perfection.
She clicked . She named it “Angewandte – Full Gaussian Hell.”
She closed her laptop. She walked to the vending machine, bought a stale granola bar, and ate it in the dark. Somewhere in the server room, a cluster of CPUs hummed a requiem for the hours of her life she would never get back.
Alena jumped. No one was there. The lab was empty. Then her monitor flickered. The EndNote window glitched, and a new field appeared: . In gray, monospaced font, the words typed themselves:





