Miserables 2019 — Los

This is not a redemption. It is a condemnation. Hugo believed in the possibility of mercy (Valjean sparing Javert). Ly shows that mercy is a luxury of the powerful. The film ends in an eternal loop: a brutalized child facing a scared cop. The gunshot could be Issa dying, or Stéphane dying, or both. It doesn’t matter. The system has already claimed its victims. Les Misérables was released just months before the murder of George Floyd and the subsequent global protests. But more presciently, it was set in Montfermeil, one of the epicenters of the 2005 French riots—the worst civil unrest France had seen since May 1968. Ly’s film is a warning that went unheeded.

The inciting incident is small. A runaway boy named Issa (Issa Perica) steals a lion cub from a traveling circus run by a Romani trainer, Zorro. When the circus owner threatens the entire neighborhood to get his animal back, the police hunt Issa down. The chase ends in a rooftop confrontation. Chris, in a moment of panicked brutality, fires a rubber bullet point-blank into Issa’s face. The boy collapses. The cops realize they have just maimed a child.

When Buzz flies his drone, he sees everything the police try to hide. The drone democratizes surveillance. It takes the power of the panopticon—Foucault’s nightmare of the state watching you—and turns it back on the state. In the final, terrifying sequence, the drone is grounded. The only perspective left is Stéphane’s human eye, staring down a child with a bottle of fire. Without the witness, there is only violence. The ending of Les Misérables (2019) is notorious. After the police are trapped, Issa reappears. He has retrieved a Molotov cocktail. He walks slowly toward Stéphane, who has his gun drawn. Stéphane screams: “Ne tire pas!” (“Don’t shoot!”) but it is unclear if he is talking to Issa or to himself. los miserables 2019

Cut to black. A single gunshot.

By [Your Name]

In 2019, a film simply titled Les Misérables arrived not as another adaptation of Victor Hugo’s 1862 novel, but as a devastating correction to it. Ladj Ly’s debut feature—nominated for an Oscar and winner of the Jury Prize at Cannes—borrows the title of France’s great humanist epic to ask a harrowing question: What if Jean Valjean’s France never really changed?

Where Hugo’s novel ends with Valjean dying in peace, forgiven by Cosette, Ly’s film offers no catharsis. It offers only the concrete, the drone, and the flame. In 2019, Ladj Ly took the most beloved title in French literature and turned it into an indictment. Les Misérables are still here. They are still angry. And they are still waiting for justice that never comes. This is not a redemption

Set not in the barricades of post-Napoleonic Paris, but in the housing projects of Montfermeil—the very place where Hugo set the home of the Thénardiers—Ly’s film is a powder keg of social realism, police brutality, and simmering communal rage. This is not a musical. There is no singing, no soaring redemption arc. There is only the concrete jungle, the drone’s eye view, and the slow, inexorable countdown to a riot. Ly, a director who grew up in the same Montfermeil estates he films, structures the narrative like a classical tragedy with three clear acts, mirroring the triptych of Hugo’s original novel: Fantine, Cosette, and Marius.

We meet Stéphane Ruiz (Damien Bonnard), a well-intentioned, middle-class cop who has just transferred into the Anti-Crime Brigade (BAC) of Montfermeil. He is the audience’s avatar—naive, eager to “do things by the book.” He is partnered with two veterans: the cynical, by-the-numbers Chris (Alexis Manenti) and the volatile, hot-headed Gwada (Djebril Zonga). The first act is a tour of the neighborhood’s delicate ecosystem: the mayor who rules from the town hall, the imam who runs the prayer hall, and “The Mayor” of the projects—a Black crime lord named The Sheriff (Ismaël Bangoura) who enforces his own law. Stéphane learns quickly: the street has its own police. Ly shows that mercy is a luxury of the powerful

A masterpiece of social thriller. Do not watch it expecting hope. Watch it because you need to understand why the hope ran out.

BANNER-BLANC

Mitos y Realidades del Juego

En torno a la oferta de juego regulada en España han surgido una serie de afirmaciones no ajustadas a la realidad. A través de noticias que aparecerán sucesivamente en este espacio, confrontaremos ciertos mitos que han consolidado principalmente en los medios de comunicación generalistas.

Público o Privado: la esencia del juego no varía, es la misma

¿Acaso el sector del Juego en España es una 'jungla'? Desde 1977 está sometido a una extensa y altísima regulación autonómica y estatal

Jugar forma parte del ocio y del entretenimiento de los españoles en el ejercicio de su libertad y responsabilidad individuales

El consumo de juego real en España, un 50% por debajo de los niveles de 2019

¿Es cierto que hay demasiada publicidad del juego, cuya finalidad es atraer dinero fácil?

Los establecimientos de juego siempre han buscado las zonas urbanas más comerciales y con mayor densidad de población

¿Acaso una empresa autorizada sujeta a multitud de requisitos administrativos, fiscales y normativos puede estar interesada en menores que se cuelan en el local?

Que los establecimientos de juego tengan fachadas opacas y vidrieras oscuras es un criterio normativo impuesto por la Administración

El sector del juego de entretenimiento privado defiende el criterio de distancia entre salones y otros locales de juego cuando se respeta la seguridad jurídica de las empresas

La práctica del juego legal en España es una actividad ejercida por la ciudadanía en el uso de su responsabilidad y libertad individual

España, entre los cuatro países del mundo occidental con un menor indicador de juego problemático

BANNER-BLANC
BANNER-BLANC

Área Privada de Clientes

Área Privada de Suscriptores de la revista Joc Privat.