Strictly English Ielts Reading Answers Apr 2026

In conclusion, both roads and railways serve irreplaceable roles. However, given the urgent need to reduce emissions and congestion, a modest shift in funding toward rail is justified, provided that rural road access is not compromised.

On the other hand, those advocating for greater railway spending point to environmental and efficiency benefits. Trains emit significantly less carbon dioxide per passenger-kilometre than cars or lorries, helping nations meet climate targets. Railways also reduce traffic congestion, which costs major cities billions annually in lost productivity. Furthermore, high-speed rail offers a time-competitive alternative to domestic flights and road travel for medium distances. Countries like Japan and France have demonstrated that strategic rail investment drives regional economic integration. strictly english ielts reading answers

(Band 7+ level)

In my opinion, governments should allocate slightly more to railways in the long term, especially for intercity and high-density corridors, while maintaining essential roads for rural and local access. A purely road-based system encourages car dependency and pollution, whereas neglecting roads leaves communities isolated. The optimal solution is integrated planning: expand electrified rail networks where demand is high, and use road budgets for maintenance and last-mile connections. In conclusion, both roads and railways serve irreplaceable

Proponents of road investment argue that roads offer unparalleled flexibility and last-mile connectivity. Buses, cars, and trucks can reach remote villages, hospitals, and industrial zones that railways cannot easily access. For example, emergency services and perishable goods delivery rely entirely on roads. Moreover, road construction often generates more local employment per dollar spent and can be completed faster than railway projects, making it a practical choice for developing economies. Countries like Japan and France have demonstrated that